| 中文版 English

具体要求

其它要求

-
关闭
An exceptional and important 'Guan' lobed dish, Southern Song dynasty
美国
03月25日 晚上9点30分 开拍 / 03月23日 下午3点 截止委托
拍品描述 翻译
Lot Details Description Diameter 5? in., 14 cm Condition report Provenance Collection of Frederick M. Mayer (1899-1974). Christie’s London, 24th-25th June 1974, lot 59 (offered). Spink & Son Ltd., London, prior to 1990. Chang Foundation, Taipei. Literature James Spencer, Zhongguo lidai taoci xuanji / Selected Chinese Ceramics from Han to Qing Dynasties, Chang Foundation, Taipei, 1990, pl. 41. Catalogue note The story of guan (‘official’) ware is one of mystery and delight. Born from necessity amidst the chaos of the twelfth century, these extraordinary pieces survive today in minuscule numbers in the world’s most important collections and are celebrated as among the most beloved and iconic Imperial ceramics ever produced. The phenomenon of ceramics specifically commissioned for the Chinese court was not born with guan ware. Starting in the Tang dynasty (618–907) and culminating in the Northern Song (960–1127), the ruling dynasties of China turned to the finest artisans and kiln sites of their day to furnish their palaces with tribute pieces. From the Yue kilns of Zhejiang to the Ding kilns of Hebei, successive rulers left their mark on the visual history of China in their patronage of kiln sites and endorsement of certain aesthetics. By the late Northern Song dynasty, this aesthetic was one of refinement. Developing in tandem with the Buddhist and Neo-Confucianist teachings of the day, Northern Song emperors – and particularly the penultimate Emperor Huizong (r. 1100–1126) – endorsed a literati aesthetic of radical minimalism, embracing the spontaneity and understated beauty of the natural world. Unlike the more elaborate decoration of preceding rulers, dubbed as 'gaudy as jewelry' by Emperor Huizong (see Patricia Buckley Ebrey, Accumulating Culture. The Collections of Emperor Huizong, Seattle, 2008, p. 344f), the late Northern Song court saw the development of the rich tradition of scholarly art, dominated by restraint and modesty over glamour and ostentatiousness. In the realm of ceramics, this aesthetic had been embodied by the famous Ru wares of Baofeng, Henan. Of simple forms with a plain glaze said to mimic the 'blue of the sky after rain,' Ru ware aligned perfectly with Song views of subtlety, balance and unstatement and, in the latter years of the Northern Song, appears to have been produced specifically and exclusively to the orders of the court. However, this patronage was to be short-lived. Following the invasion of northern China by the Jurchen-led Jin dynasty in 1125, the Song court was forced to flee from its capital of Bianliang (modern-day Kaifeng) and settle in Lin’an (Hangzhou) in 1127, where it was to remain for more than a century. Divorced from their imperial kilns and keen to establish themselves as the undisputed center of Chinese civilization, the emperors of the nascent Southern Song clung to the aesthetics of their predecessors and founded new official (guan) kilns to imitate their beloved Ru. While the forms and textures of the new guan wares may have been inspired by those of Ru and other Northern wares, before long, Southern guan ware had developed into its own established artform. Suffused with rich networks of crackle caused by the cooling glaze, guan ware is celebrated for its atmospheric subtlety and refined tactile presence. Although perhaps initially produced accidentally, potters soon deliberately sought to reproduce this enchanting crackle, applying multiple layers of glaze that, when fired and cooled, would enliven the surface with crazing reminiscent of veins in jade or frost on stone. When the glaze thinned at the rim or foot, the iron-rich dark stoneware body appeared as a 'purple mouth and iron foot,' a hallmark look prized by court collectors as part of the ware’s introspective beauty, while its rich unctuous glaze proved as enchanting to hold as it was to look upon. In a similar departure from its northern predecessors, guan ware also displays a remarkable level of variation and lack of restraint in its forms and colors. From rich silvery greens to warm cream tones and dark grey cobweb-like crazing, each piece of guan ware in the Palace collections and beyond is a unique work of art. Even among related hexalobed dishes of this form, for example, a wide variation exists. From those fired on firing spurs to those fired directly on their rim; guan dishes of this design were produced in series of varying colors and sizes (from ca. 18.7 cm to 23 cm), seemingly at the whims of their ancient craftsmen who – unlike their Ru predecessors – had the task of producing imperial wares thrust upon them without the generations of developed practice. This variation, while lending each piece a unique quality, has also led to some questions as to the attribution and dating of guan ware. With a thick celadon glaze suffused with crackles, guan was often compared by Ming scholars with a related Ge (‘older brother’) ware attributed to the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368). Produced at least one of the same kiln sites as guan (Laohudong) in the Yuan dynasty, the question of how Ge wares are distinguished from guan remains pernicious. In the fourteenth century Gegu yaolun (Important discussions about assessing antiques), for example, scholar Cao Zhao cites Ge and guan wares as distinct but describes both as of an uneven celadon tone with ‘purple mouth’ and ‘iron foot’, distinguishing guan for its slightly pinker glaze and Ge for its more coarse clay body and ‘weaker’ color. This color distinction, relied on by scholars until today may, however, be more a case of a piece’s positioning in the kiln than anything systematic. This mystery is only further compounded by the importance placed on guan wares in the ensuing centuries. Preserved in court collections and uncovered in archaeological contexts, the discovery of guan pieces in later contexts illustrates the continued esteem in which they were held, even long after the Southern Song. A group of twelve dishes unearthed from the early Ming tomb of official Wang Xingzu (1338–1371) outside Zhonghua Gate, Nanjing, for example, shows forms and glaze characteristics almost indistinguishable from canonical guan wares and the present dish. With a rich celadon color, subtle crackle and dark stoneware body that reveals itself at rims and feet, consistent with Southern Song guan excavated in Hangzhou contexts, the Wang Xingzu dishes (now preserved between the Nanjing Museum and Palace Museum, Beijing), while variously attributed to the Yuan dynasty, may well be products of the Southern Song, passed into elite collections and even burial contexts well into the Ming period. By the Qing dynasty, the primacy of guan ware was unquestionable. Preserved in great number in the imperial collections, guan wares – and specifically dishes of this design – appear prominently in catalogues of the imperial collections. Compare four hexalobed dishes of related form depicted in the 1728 catalogue of the collection of the Yongzheng Emperor (r. 1723-1735), the Guwan tu (Pictures of Ancient Playthings), preserved in the British Museum, London (accession no. PDF,X.01) (Fig. 1) and another four in the 1729 volume at the Victoria and Albert Museum, London (accession no. E.59-1911). Yongzheng’s successor, the Qianlong Emperor (r. 1736-1795) was a particularly ardent admirer of guan. Of the hundred and ninety-nine recorded poems composed by the Emperor in praise of ceramics, more than a third (seventy) are in praise of his beloved guan wares and six of these are still found on vessels preserved in the collection of the Palace Museum, Beijing; see Gao Xiaoran, ‘Qianlong yuzhi shi ciqi kaolun / Studies of Ceramics with Inscriptions of “Imperial Poems” Composed by Emperor Qianlong’, Gugong Xuekan, 2011, pp 294-309. Certainly one reason for this imperial esteem is guan ware’s exceptional rarity. Today just thirty closely related dishes are preserved from the Qing court in the National Palace Museum, Taipei and six in the Palace Museum, Beijing, generally catalogued as Ge ware but attributed to the Southern Song dynasty in The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum. Porcelain of the Song Dynasty, vol. 2, Beijing, 1996, pls 74, 78, 82, 84, 85, 91. While the Taipei examples similarly have been variously attributed as ‘Song’, ‘Song - Yuan’ or ‘Yuan’ since their first major exhibition in 1989 (Song Guan yao tezhan / Catalogue of the Special Exhibition of Sung Dynasty Kuan Ware, National Palace Museum, Taipei, 1989), the splendor and enchanting quality of these dishes has remained undeniable. With six simple notches carved into the rim and a gently fluted form rising from a crisp delicate foot, the dish is rendered like a blossom floating on the surface of the water, inviting the beholder to touch. Beyond the Palace collections, surviving examples of related form are exceedingly rare. Compare a closely related dish with a metal-bound rim preserved in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (accession no. 24.172.1), in Suzanne Valenstein, A Handbook of Chinese Ceramics, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1975, pl. 61 (Fig. 2); seven from the collection of Sir Percival David in the British Museum, London, illustrated in Stacey Pierson, Illustrated catalogue of Ru, Guan, Jun, Guangdong and Yixing wares in the Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, London, 1999, cat. nos 13, 14, A32, 28, 56, 89 and A39, the first three with Qianlong inscriptions and others likely with Qing court provenance (Fig. 3); two from the collection of Sir Harry Garner: one broken and preserved in the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge (accession no. C.6-1978) in Basil Gray, Sung Porcelain and Stoneware, London, 1984, pl 103; and the other most recently sold in our Hong Kong rooms as part of the Ise Collection, 9th September 2025, lot 5022 (Fig. 4); and another from the Junkunc Collection, sold more recently in our Hong Kong rooms, 4th April 2017, lot 1106 (Fig. 5).

本场其它拍品

  • 竞价阶梯
  • 快递物流
  • 拍卖规则
  • 支付方式
竞价区间 加价幅度
0
10
100
50
500
100
1,000
200
2,000
250
5,000
500
10,000
1,000
20,000
2,000
50,000
5,000
100,000
10,000
+

委托价 (已有0次出价)

美元

价格信息

拍品估价:1,200,000 - 1,800,000 美元 起拍价格:1,200,000 美元  买家佣金:
落槌价 佣金比率
0 - 2,000,000 28.00% + VAT
2,000,000 - 8,000,000 22.00% + VAT
8,000,000 - 以上 15.00% + VAT

拍卖公司

Sotheby's
地址: 1334 York Avenue
电话: +1 212 606 7000
邮编: 10021
向卖家提问

小贴士

1. 一般拍卖公司接受的付款方式有以下几种:
现金、信用卡、转账汇款、银行支票、个人支票以及PayPal支付。
使用PayPal支付时,请留意需要在账单金额的基础上额外加上 4% 的手续费。
2. 信用卡的种类有以下几种:
3. 转账汇款时请注意银行手续费
海外拍企会要求足额到账,所以请您在汇款时,选择足额到账,或在汇款金额的基础上加上汇款手续费(如25美金)。
4. 国际转账汇款时, 您需要知道海外拍卖行以下汇款信息:
* 收款人名称
* 收款人地址
* 收款人银行账号
* 收款银行国际编码(8位字母数字组合,必填项, 如: BFKKAT2K)
* 收款银行清算码(9位数字组合,选填项)
* 收款银行名称
* 收款银行地址
5. 运输相关事项
有的海外拍卖行会替您安排和协调运输, 您只需要支付相关的运费及保险费(如您需要)即可;有的海外拍卖行会推荐几家长期合作的运输公司, 这些运输公司有着良好的信誉和高质量的工作效率,您大可放心。您只需要提供您的收货地址, 竞得拍品账单。 运输公司会根据您提供的信息给您报价, 您可以在其中选择最优的报价者来承担运输任务。然后就是付款了, 信用卡是最常用的支付手段, 当然还有其他像PayPal,转账等。
6. 进口通关可能出现的关税
国际运送的包裹在进口清关过程中如需支付关税,需由包裹接受人(即买家)自行承担。 征收标准:具体征收标准和额度以海关通知和解释为准。
7. 禁拍拍品
海外拍卖会可能会出现中国法律禁止交易的物品,如枪支、管制刀具、象牙、犀角等;中国买家不得通过本平台参与上述物品的拍卖活动;任何情形下,买家均须对自己的竞拍行为独立承担责任。
服务热线:400-608-1178
查看全部小贴士