| 中文版 English

具体要求

其它要求

-
关闭
The Tian Min Fu Yi Fang Ding, Late Shang dynasty | 商末 天黽父乙方鼎
美国 北京时间
2022年09月20日 开拍 / 2022年09月18日 截止委托
拍品描述 翻译
The Tian Min Fu Yi Fang DingLate Shang dynasty商末 天黽父乙方鼎cast to the interior with?a four-character?inscription reading Tian Min fu yi銘文:天黽父乙Height 9 in., 22.8 cm

étude Boisgirard & A. de Heeckeren, H?tel Drouot, Paris, 1980.

Offered at Sotheby's London, 18th June 1985, lot 222.?


étude Boisgirard & A. de Heeckeren,德魯奧拍賣行,巴黎,1980年

上拍於倫敦蘇富比1985年6月18日,編號222

Because this lot was imported into the United States after September 1, 2020, it is subject to an import tariff of 7.5% of the value declared upon entry into the United States. $30,000, plus applicable sales tax will be included on your invoice unless you instruct Sotheby's to arrange shipping of the lot to a foreign address. For more information on the import tariff, please review the Symbol Key in the back of the catalogue. If you have any questions, please contact?tariffs@sothebys.com。


由於本拍品在 2020年9月1日之後進口到美國,所以買家可能需就本拍品支付進口關稅,金額為拍品進口美國當時申報價值的7.5%。除非您要求蘇富比安排運送拍品到美國境外之地址,否則發票上將包括30,000美元以及相關的銷售稅。如欲查詢進口關稅的更多信息,請查閱目錄背面的附錄。 如有任何疑問,敬請聯繫tariffs@sothebys.com。


For more information on and additional videos for this lot, please contact serina.wei@sothebys.com.


From the Wu Dacheng Circle of Bronze Connoisseurs

Regina Krahl


This archaic bronze cauldron of square (fang) ding shape is remarkable for the rendering of its taotie design, which is composed of broad scrolling bands arranged in almost abstract mask formations around slightly raised oval eyes, both in the center and around the corners of the vessel. On account of this taotie style, it can be attributed to the late Shang period, although the basic vessel form and decoration continued into the Western Zhou. The present piece is extremely rare for showing prominent flanges at the four corners.


A fang ding with very similar decoration but lacking the flanges, the Geng Shi Fang Ding, was recovered from Xiaodun in Yinxu, capital city of the Shang at Anyang from the early 14th to the mid-11th century BC, and is illustrated in Yinxu qingtong qi / Bronze Vessels from Yin Xu, Beijing, 1985, pl. 232 and fig. 85: 1. It is attributed to the fourth period of the site, corresponding to the reign of the last two Shang kings. Another very similar fang ding, also without corner flanges, in The Saint Louis Art Museum?is extensively described and discussed in Steven D. Owyoung, Ancient Chinese Bronzes in The Saint Louis Art Museum, St. Louis, 1997, no. 16; and a third closely related vessel lacking the flanges, in the collection of Tadashi Sengoku, was exhibited at the Osaka Art Club in 2004 and is published in the accompanying catalogue by Junko Namba, Chūgoku ōchō no sui [Essence of Chinese dynasties], Himeji, 2004, no. 27.


Owyoung, who attributes the St. Louis fang ding also to the late Shang period, the 11th century BC, carefully explains the taotie design as being based on earlier Erligang models, but stylistically adapted in the Anyang phase of the Shang (op.cit., p. 77): “Instead of the dense leiwen ground, multiple motifs, and elaborate structure of other Anyang-phase bronzes, this vessel adopts a simpler decoration which is a condensed and rather compacted version of the earlier bronze decorative mode of Loehr Style II. Found on bronzes dating from the 15th to 14th centuries BC, these are pre-Anyang designs in which the zoomorphs are delineated by flat ribbons for their bodies and plain bosses for their eyes. The effect of the decor is sculptural, a design in which the elongated and often flowing ribbons and curls of uneven width are complemented by generous, equally irregular, and visually complex negative spaces. In contrast, the design of spurred curls, S-shapes, and interlocking stemmed C-curls found on the Saint Louis piece is deliberately linear, depending on thin, even, regular lines to simply produce the wide forms that suggest the earlier Erligang-phase model but deny the richness of shadow and light of sculpted forms.”


It is interesting to compare the design on the present cauldron and the three comparisons listed above to other related fang ding, where the design band is composed of thinner lines and more clearly arranged in three horizontal rows, a style that can be attributed to the early Western Zhou period. An intermediary, apparently still of Shang date, is a fang ding from Fufeng in Shaanxi, published in Robert W. Bagley, Shang Ritual Bronzes in the Arthur M. Sackler Collections, Washington, D.C., 1987, p. 129, fig. 192; but the Western Zhou style is clearly represented by a related vessel with a rare cover in the Palace Museum, Beijing, the Tian Gao Fang Ding excavated in Baoji, Shaanxi province, previously attributed to the late Shang, but now to the early Western Zhou period, published in Gugong qingtong qi/Bronzes in the Palace Museum, Beijing, 1999, pl. 23; and in Gugong jingdian. Gugong qingtong qi tudian/Classics of the Forbidden City. Bronzes of the Forbidden City, Beijing, 2010, pl. 57; another, very similar to the Gugong example, is illustrated in Bernhard Karlgren, ‘New Studies on Chinese Bronzes’, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, no. 9, 1937, pl. XXVIII, no. 18, where the author calls this Western Zhou type of taotie motif ‘animal triple band’. On the earlier style of the present vessel, the scroll elements of the taotie motifs are much more freely assembled around the eyes.


The inscription on our fang ding contains a clan sign, which is composed of the pictographs of a human figure and a toad, and the characters fu yi, ‘Father Yi’. A similar clan sign has been interpreted by Hentze as a divine ancestor figure arising from an animal head (Carl Hentze, ‘Antithetische T’ao-t’ieh Motive’, in Herbert Kühn, ed., IPEK. Jahrbuch für Pr?historische & Ethnographische Kunst, vol. 23, Berlin, 1972, pp. 3f. and pl. 3, fig. 18).


The present vessel is recorded since at least the Guangxu period of the late Qing dynasty, when Wu Dacheng (1835-1902) included it in his compilation of bronze inscriptions, published in 1896. Wu was a scholar-official, compiler of the Imperial Han Lin Academy, and renowned collector of archaic works of art, who discussed and exchanged items with a group of famous contemporary connoisseurs and bronze collectors such as Pan Zuyin (1830-1930), Chen Jieqi (1813-1884), Wang Yirong (1845-1900) and others. One of whom must have owned the present vessel, since the inscriptions Wu assembled in his Kezhai jigulu?came from his own bronzes and those of his friends. Wu himself owned a somewhat different pair of fang ding decorated with confronted dragons on a leiwen ground above the plain band, and with prominent flanged at the corners, which appear in a set of composite rubbings of archaic bronzes made for Wu by Yin Bohuan, and again in the Kezhai jigu tu, a handscroll of rubbings done by Wu and others, and are today in the Shanghai Museum, see Wang Tao, Mirroring China’s Past. Emperors, Scholars, and Their Bronzes, The Art Institute of Chicago, New Haven and London, 2018, cat. nos 146 and 154, and p. 194, fig. 9.


鑄冶商輝?金石緣誼


康蕊君


本青銅方鼎饕餮紋飾細緻精美,橢圓形雙目微突,造型風格抽象,延貫四周。究其饕餮紋風格可斷代商末,而整體器型及裝飾則延見於西周時期。本例四邊扉棱,風格突出,極為罕見。


參考一相類方鼎例,與本品紋飾極為相近,唯欠扉棱,斷代公元前14世紀初至11世紀中葉,於商都安陽殷墟小屯村出土,圖載於《殷墟青銅器》,北京,1985年,圖版232,圖85:1(圖一),屬殷墟文化第四期,即商末最後兩任君主帝乙﹑帝辛時期。再見一方鼎例(圖二),四邊無扉棱,現存於美國聖路易斯美術館,學者Steven D. Owyoung於著作《Ancient Chinese Bronzes》當中曾作詳細論述,聖路易斯,1997年,編號16;另比一例,亦無扉棱,千石唯司收藏,2004年展於大阪美術倶楽部,並載於難波純子著展覽圖錄,《中國王朝の粋》,姫路, 2004年,編號27。


學者Owyoung將聖路易斯美術館收藏之方鼎斷代商末,即公元前 11 世紀,並解釋該鼎饕餮紋設計以二里崗文化雛本為模,風格則取自商代安陽時期(出處同上,頁77):「此器紋飾較爲簡單,異於安陽時期其他青銅器雷紋地、多紋飾及結構繁雜之特點,相比羅樾二號風格(Loehr Style II),本器紋飾更爲緊凑小巧。 此類紋飾可追溯至公元前 15 至 14 世紀,為安陽時期之前的風格,該時期饕餮紋以浮雕條紋刻畫軀幹,獸目素面凸起,頗具雕塑感。其線條流暢,寬窄相間,紋飾與留白相輔相成,視覺效果繁複精巧。聖路易斯美術館收藏作例紋飾則以鉤形、S形及互扣之C形為主,以纖細均勻的綫條勾勒輪廓,雖具較早的二里崗風格,卻無其光影分明之豐富的雕塑感。」


與上述三例及本品相比較,其他相關方鼎作例之紋飾則綫條較細,清楚分為上、中、下三排,屬西周早期風格。可比一例,風格介於兩者之間,斷代商朝,陝西扶風縣出土,載於羅伯特?貝格利,《Shang Ritual Bronzes in the Arthur M. Sackler Collections》,華盛頓,1987年,頁129,圖192;再比一例,陝西寳鷄出土田告方鼎,其西周風格突出,鼎蓋甚爲罕見,現藏於北京故宮博物院,曾一度斷代商末,現定為西周初,載於《故宮青銅器》,北京,1999年,圖版 23,以及《故宮經典:故宮青銅器圖典》,北京,2010年,圖版57;另比一例,與田告方鼎相近,圖載於高本漢,〈New Studies on Chinese Bronzes〉,《Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities》,1937年,第9期,圖版XXVIII,編號18,作者形容其西周風格的饕餮紋為「三環獸紋」。本方鼎斷代商末,風格較早於以上作例,故其饕餮紋飾圍繞獸目更具自然分佈之勢。


本鼎鑄一復合族徽「天黽」,由人形及蛙形圖形文字組成。學者卡爾?亨茨認爲,此類復合族徽或為刻畫祖先英靈自獸首升起,(卡爾?亨茨,〈Antithetische T'ao-t'ieh Motive〉,赫伯特?庫恩編,《IPEK Jahrbuch für Pr?historische & Ethnographische Kunst》,柏林,1972年,卷23,頁3f及圖版3,圖 18)。


本鼎著錄可溯至晚清光緒年間,吳大澂(1835-1902)1896年彙編金石銘文成書,已記載此器。吳大澂,翰林院編修,收藏高古金石甚豐,與同時期重要金石鑒藏家如潘祖蔭(1830-1890)、陳介祺(1813-1884)及王懿榮 (1845-1900)等相交甚篤,經常見面或通信,討論及交換藏品。吳大澂著《愙齋集古圖》所錄拓本均來自其本人及友人收藏,故可知本鼎源自吳大澂或其朋友所藏。吳大澂另藏一方鼎,略異於本品,上層紋飾以雷紋地襯對稱龍紋,邊緣出戟突出,可見尹伯圜拓本,亦載於吳大澂及友人手拓之《愙齋集古錄》,現存上海博物館,參考汪濤著《吉金鑒古》,芝加哥美術學院,紐黑文及倫敦,2018年,編號 146 及154 號,以及頁194,圖9。


本场其它拍品

  • 竞价阶梯
  • 快递物流
  • 拍卖规则
  • 支付方式
竞价区间 加价幅度
0
10
100
50
500
100
1,000
200
2,000
250
5,000
500
10,000
1,000
20,000
2,000
50,000
5,000
100,000
10,000
+

价格信息

拍品估价:300,000 - 500,000 美元 起拍价格:300,000 美元  买家佣金:
落槌价 佣金比率
0 - 180,000 25.00%
180,000 - 2,000,000 20.00%
2,000,000 - 以上 12.90%
服务费:平台服务费为成交总金额(含佣金)的3%

拍卖公司

Sotheby's
地址: 1334 York Avenue
邮编: 10021
向卖家提问

小贴士

1. 一般拍卖公司接受的付款方式有以下几种:
现金、信用卡、转账汇款、银行支票、个人支票以及PayPal支付。
使用PayPal支付时,请留意需要在账单金额的基础上额外加上 4% 的手续费。
2. 信用卡的种类有以下几种:
3. 转账汇款时请注意银行手续费
海外拍企会要求足额到账,所以请您在汇款时,选择足额到账,或在汇款金额的基础上加上汇款手续费(如25美金)。
4. 国际转账汇款时, 您需要知道海外拍卖行以下汇款信息:
* 收款人名称
* 收款人地址
* 收款人银行账号
* 收款银行国际编码(8位字母数字组合,必填项, 如: BFKKAT2K)
* 收款银行清算码(9位数字组合,选填项)
* 收款银行名称
* 收款银行地址
5. 运输相关事项
有的海外拍卖行会替您安排和协调运输, 您只需要支付相关的运费及保险费(如您需要)即可;有的海外拍卖行会推荐几家长期合作的运输公司, 这些运输公司有着良好的信誉和高质量的工作效率,您大可放心。您只需要提供您的收货地址, 竞得拍品账单。 运输公司会根据您提供的信息给您报价, 您可以在其中选择最优的报价者来承担运输任务。然后就是付款了, 信用卡是最常用的支付手段, 当然还有其他像PayPal,转账等。
6. 进口通关可能出现的关税
国际运送的包裹在进口清关过程中如需支付关税,需由包裹接受人(即买家)自行承担。 征收标准:具体征收标准和额度以海关通知和解释为准。
7. 禁拍拍品
海外拍卖会可能会出现中国法律禁止交易的物品,如枪支、管制刀具、象牙、犀角等;中国买家不得通过本平台参与上述物品的拍卖活动;任何情形下,买家均须对自己的竞拍行为独立承担责任。
服务热线:400-608-1178
查看全部小贴士